Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 558066" data-attributes="member: 13090">It would be a toss-up, for me, between the D810 and the D750. I find the D750 a bit more nimble than the D810 with it's smaller file-size and lighter body. If I had to choose a &quot;Jack of all Trades, Master at None&quot; Nikon body, the best choice for the generalist photographer, it would be the D750; though the D810 would be a close second. If my shooting ran heavily, meaning almost exclusively, towards landscape or architectural photography then I would probably side with the D810. Either one would be a monumental upgrade.Tossing the D500 in the mix makes this more of apples to oranges comparison in my mind. There's no doubt the D500 is a beastly DX body, but I still think of DX and FX as two very different tools. The D500 should definitely be a consideration if your shooting leans heavily towards wildlife photography; if you're birder for instance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 558066, member: 13090"] It would be a toss-up, for me, between the D810 and the D750. I find the D750 a bit more nimble than the D810 with it's smaller file-size and lighter body. If I had to choose a "Jack of all Trades, Master at None" Nikon body, the best choice for the generalist photographer, it would be the D750; though the D810 would be a close second. If my shooting ran heavily, meaning almost exclusively, towards landscape or architectural photography then I would probably side with the D810. Either one would be a monumental upgrade. Tossing the D500 in the mix makes this more of apples to oranges comparison in my mind. There's no doubt the D500 is a beastly DX body, but I still think of DX and FX as two very different tools. The D500 should definitely be a consideration if your shooting leans heavily towards wildlife photography; if you're birder for instance. [/QUOTE]

Verification