Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 199527" data-attributes="member: 12496">OK, mp is about resolution, but a D800 image is 36 mp, and which automatically wins, regardless of what this threads OP said about it.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />But if you are going to compute pixels per inch of sensor dimension, it is not meaningful until you also compute in the greater enlargement&nbsp; required of DX before they can even be viewed and the numbers compared to FX.We can agree on that. Any mention of 72 dpi for video is mistaken and misleading, confuses the newbies.&nbsp;&nbsp; Hearing it is like stepping back in time 10 or 15 years.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; But my saying this probably means the powers that be will delete this message again.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 199527, member: 12496"] OK, mp is about resolution, but a D800 image is 36 mp, and which automatically wins, regardless of what this threads OP said about it. :) But if you are going to compute pixels per inch of sensor dimension, it is not meaningful until you also compute in the greater enlargement required of DX before they can even be viewed and the numbers compared to FX. We can agree on that. Any mention of 72 dpi for video is mistaken and misleading, confuses the newbies. Hearing it is like stepping back in time 10 or 15 years. But my saying this probably means the powers that be will delete this message again. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification