Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D300/D300s
The D300s replacement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 67459" data-attributes="member: 6548"><p>Yeah but that test doesn't take into account shooting a 1000 snaps a day for extended periods plus it is sort of dogmatic...the only time you will really see a glaring difference is high ISO stuff...that is just my opinion...I am talking real world vs lab stuff in this regard. I truly believe in both the lab and the real world the D7000 will smoke the D300 in the dark with any kind of glass. That is it's main advantage. That being said I still think there is a place for both...high end consumer and semi pro body...one type of shooter needs one another type of shooter needs the other.</p><p></p><p>My old F2 will outlast all of them as long as film is made and I don't care what anyone says it still makes a mean snap...but it is so obsolete...kind of like comparing a 67 big block Corvette to a 2012 Corvette...wouldn't it be nice to own both? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eye-level, post: 67459, member: 6548"] Yeah but that test doesn't take into account shooting a 1000 snaps a day for extended periods plus it is sort of dogmatic...the only time you will really see a glaring difference is high ISO stuff...that is just my opinion...I am talking real world vs lab stuff in this regard. I truly believe in both the lab and the real world the D7000 will smoke the D300 in the dark with any kind of glass. That is it's main advantage. That being said I still think there is a place for both...high end consumer and semi pro body...one type of shooter needs one another type of shooter needs the other. My old F2 will outlast all of them as long as film is made and I don't care what anyone says it still makes a mean snap...but it is so obsolete...kind of like comparing a 67 big block Corvette to a 2012 Corvette...wouldn't it be nice to own both? :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D300/D300s
The D300s replacement
Top