Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 755662" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Yikes that is expensive! :eyetwitch: Hopefully Nikon will come out with a mirrorless DX that rivals the D500 but without the high end price tag. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> That way you could still use your Nikon 200-500mm lens, and the overall cost would be much less. As for me, I'm still happy with my DSLR bodies/lenses. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I held out on switching to a DSLR body until late 2011 - long after they debuted. My biggest concern would be getting repair service if necessary for any DSLR bodies or lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 755662, member: 13196"] Yikes that is expensive! :eyetwitch: Hopefully Nikon will come out with a mirrorless DX that rivals the D500 but without the high end price tag. ;) That way you could still use your Nikon 200-500mm lens, and the overall cost would be much less. As for me, I'm still happy with my DSLR bodies/lenses. :) I held out on switching to a DSLR body until late 2011 - long after they debuted. My biggest concern would be getting repair service if necessary for any DSLR bodies or lenses. [/QUOTE]

Verification