Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wud" data-source="post: 218869" data-attributes="member: 13578">I have the 70-200 f2.8 and I think its very good for portraits, also full body. Been using it a lot with the family pictures I do. As I read, the f/4 should be just as good. Its very fast. This 105mm can easily do full body, you just have to move away BUT its pretty slow. When using auto focus, it blurres the image out and then focus again, whenever I dont keep it on the subject. Maybe this wont matter so much if shooting adults, but for kids (and dogs and so on) this will probably mean, missing a lot of great shots as the lens are to slow. Nevertheless, its really sharp and I like this 105mm a LOT. What will you be photographing with it? Nice looking cake! I dont know if they changed anything, I upload to my gallery and then insert here by clicking &quot;my photos&quot; (under this writing box, left side). </blockquote>

[QUOTE="wud, post: 218869, member: 13578"] I have the 70-200 f2.8 and I think its very good for portraits, also full body. Been using it a lot with the family pictures I do. As I read, the f/4 should be just as good. Its very fast. This 105mm can easily do full body, you just have to move away BUT its pretty slow. When using auto focus, it blurres the image out and then focus again, whenever I dont keep it on the subject. Maybe this wont matter so much if shooting adults, but for kids (and dogs and so on) this will probably mean, missing a lot of great shots as the lens are to slow. Nevertheless, its really sharp and I like this 105mm a LOT. What will you be photographing with it? Nice looking cake! I dont know if they changed anything, I upload to my gallery and then insert here by clicking "my photos" (under this writing box, left side). [/QUOTE]

Verification