Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Test thread, photobucket vs flickr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 60758" data-attributes="member: 9237"><p>I could tell which shots looked better to me, even on my cellular, West! And now, I will reveal the shots I posted and their respective site links. Drum roll please....</p><p></p><p></p><p>One: FLICKR</p><p>Two: SMUG</p><p>THREE: PHOTOBUCKET</p><p></p><p>Which one was your favorite? Mine was again, Flickr. Seems like we have a winner, at least in <em>M</em>HO, on <em>my</em> computer screen.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I simply copy/paste the image link and paste it in my browser. I guess some photo sites definitely have an advantage in regards to the way they compress images and discard or keep certain aspects of the original upload. NOW. I'll upload a TIF of a shot and a JPG on FLICKR and we shall see if this is a JPG anomaly or truth in compression algorithms..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 60758, member: 9237"] I could tell which shots looked better to me, even on my cellular, West! And now, I will reveal the shots I posted and their respective site links. Drum roll please.... One: FLICKR Two: SMUG THREE: PHOTOBUCKET Which one was your favorite? Mine was again, Flickr. Seems like we have a winner, at least in [I]M[/I]HO, on [I]my[/I] computer screen. And yes, I simply copy/paste the image link and paste it in my browser. I guess some photo sites definitely have an advantage in regards to the way they compress images and discard or keep certain aspects of the original upload. NOW. I'll upload a TIF of a shot and a JPG on FLICKR and we shall see if this is a JPG anomaly or truth in compression algorithms.. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Test thread, photobucket vs flickr
Top
