Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Telephoto - non-VR vs. VR vs. VR II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="crycocyon" data-source="post: 147993" data-attributes="member: 13076"><p>You can gain anywhere from 3-5 stops of faster shutter speed so yes it is important if you want sharp photos at slower shutter speeds. It permits you to go against the rule stating that shutter speed should be the same number or larger than the focal length. With the extra stops of speed, one doesn't have to increase ISO as much to compensate for low light or smaller apertures. </p><p></p><p>VRII lenses are newer and give additional 1 or 2 more stops of usable shutter speeds. So if you shoot a lot of handheld at lower ISO, then yes it is justified but the extra cost isn't just about VRII it is about the optical design for that particular next generation lens. </p><p></p><p>That being said, my 85 G and 300 AIS lenses do not have VR and I manage quite well without it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="crycocyon, post: 147993, member: 13076"] You can gain anywhere from 3-5 stops of faster shutter speed so yes it is important if you want sharp photos at slower shutter speeds. It permits you to go against the rule stating that shutter speed should be the same number or larger than the focal length. With the extra stops of speed, one doesn't have to increase ISO as much to compensate for low light or smaller apertures. VRII lenses are newer and give additional 1 or 2 more stops of usable shutter speeds. So if you shoot a lot of handheld at lower ISO, then yes it is justified but the extra cost isn't just about VRII it is about the optical design for that particular next generation lens. That being said, my 85 G and 300 AIS lenses do not have VR and I manage quite well without it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Telephoto - non-VR vs. VR vs. VR II
Top