Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SEMiller" data-source="post: 230279" data-attributes="member: 13234">You will not be disappointed in this lens, I believe it stacks up well against the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR II (check the DXOmark test results, see link above) especially for its price. Downsides are it will lose value just like buying a new car, the Nikon will for the most part hold it's value, important if you ever would need to sell it, and maybe it's not as sturdy as the Nikon.This lens fits my needs, I don't think I would ever sell it (I rarely sell equipment, and if I would it would be a body not a lens), I don't need the lens to make a living, it is insured&nbsp; with my other equipment and I live on Long Island not far from Tamron US headquarters, so if I had a problem I would just walk in with it. And I got it for a great price plus the $100 rebate they were offering over the summer.Sent from my iPhone using <a href="http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1" target="_blank">Tapatalk</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="SEMiller, post: 230279, member: 13234"] You will not be disappointed in this lens, I believe it stacks up well against the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR II (check the DXOmark test results, see link above) especially for its price. Downsides are it will lose value just like buying a new car, the Nikon will for the most part hold it's value, important if you ever would need to sell it, and maybe it's not as sturdy as the Nikon. This lens fits my needs, I don't think I would ever sell it (I rarely sell equipment, and if I would it would be a body not a lens), I don't need the lens to make a living, it is insured with my other equipment and I live on Long Island not far from Tamron US headquarters, so if I had a problem I would just walk in with it. And I got it for a great price plus the $100 rebate they were offering over the summer. Sent from my iPhone using [URL=http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1]Tapatalk[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification