Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NVSteve" data-source="post: 193584" data-attributes="member: 13248"><p>Yeah, the 70-300 is pretty good. It doesn't hold up to the other 2, but it does have that 200-300 range the other 2 are lacking. And it's fairly light & incredibly inexpensive. To me, the Nikon f4 feels almost identical in weight to the 70-300.</p><p></p><p>One thing to mention about the samples I posted on flickr-the Tamron 70-200 70mm shots are all labeled as 75 in the picture name. When I was going through the EXIFs for each, I discovered the Tamron was at 75 instead of 70.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NVSteve, post: 193584, member: 13248"] Yeah, the 70-300 is pretty good. It doesn't hold up to the other 2, but it does have that 200-300 range the other 2 are lacking. And it's fairly light & incredibly inexpensive. To me, the Nikon f4 feels almost identical in weight to the 70-300. One thing to mention about the samples I posted on flickr-the Tamron 70-200 70mm shots are all labeled as 75 in the picture name. When I was going through the EXIFs for each, I discovered the Tamron was at 75 instead of 70. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Review
Top
