Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 vs Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 597087" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>I have the nikon 28-70 2.8 and if that lens would give up the ghost id either get another used one or the tamron with no hesitation. I hardly shoot my 2.8 zooms at 2.8. usually at 3.5 and onward and from f/4 you wont see a difference. the nikon 24-70 is the superior lens but the price jump to what you really get compared between the two is ridiculous. </p><p></p><p>its like buying the 85 1.4g over the 85 1.8g which is a $1200+ price jump for 2/3 stop. and I shoot people between 2.8-4.5 so I wouldnt benefit from shooting so wide open. and just cause you have a 1.4 aperture it doesnt mean you need to shoot it open. its been done to death and the look is not great for portraits. 2.8 is fine for proper image with minimum focus.</p><p></p><p>get the tamron 15-30VC. its been reviewed by many that it bests the legendary 14-24 AFS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 597087, member: 14443"] I have the nikon 28-70 2.8 and if that lens would give up the ghost id either get another used one or the tamron with no hesitation. I hardly shoot my 2.8 zooms at 2.8. usually at 3.5 and onward and from f/4 you wont see a difference. the nikon 24-70 is the superior lens but the price jump to what you really get compared between the two is ridiculous. its like buying the 85 1.4g over the 85 1.8g which is a $1200+ price jump for 2/3 stop. and I shoot people between 2.8-4.5 so I wouldnt benefit from shooting so wide open. and just cause you have a 1.4 aperture it doesnt mean you need to shoot it open. its been done to death and the look is not great for portraits. 2.8 is fine for proper image with minimum focus. get the tamron 15-30VC. its been reviewed by many that it bests the legendary 14-24 AFS [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 vs Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8?
Top