Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bill16" data-source="post: 351448" data-attributes="member: 15356">Since I read your recommendation on this lens in another thread, I've been thinking about getting one too, when I have some money to that is!It sure sounds good, even on a video I watched on it for the canon.I know it won't serve my super wide needs, but it would sure fill the gap left from not having even the 18-55 kit lens.Unless I can find something like this lens that is FX? I'd really like to go with FX lenses as much as possible. Though I admit I'll likely have two or three DX lenses if it takes very long to get my FX Nikon. The Nikkor af-s 35mm lens, the tokina 11-16mm or Nikkor 10-24mm lens, and something like the tamron 17-50mm. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bill16, post: 351448, member: 15356"] Since I read your recommendation on this lens in another thread, I've been thinking about getting one too, when I have some money to that is! It sure sounds good, even on a video I watched on it for the canon. I know it won't serve my super wide needs, but it would sure fill the gap left from not having even the 18-55 kit lens. Unless I can find something like this lens that is FX? I'd really like to go with FX lenses as much as possible. Though I admit I'll likely have two or three DX lenses if it takes very long to get my FX Nikon. The Nikkor af-s 35mm lens, the tokina 11-16mm or Nikkor 10-24mm lens, and something like the tamron 17-50mm. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification