Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 150-600/Nikon 300 f/4 and 1.4x Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 388387" data-attributes="member: 24569"><p>The Nikon lens and TC are a tad sharper, but the Tamron is no slouch. I can get very sharp results with it. I'm spending most of my time using the Tamron for its extra reach and the convenience of the zoom. It has VC, Tamron's version of VR, which is also a nice plus. I just wish the Tamron focused closer and weighed a little less. But, hey, it's got to be the lightest 600mm lens on the market, and it's very reasonably priced. </p><p></p><p>The 1.4 TC does make the Nikon 300MM f/4 <em>slightly</em> less sharp. By itself, the 300 is a SUPER sharp lens, and at f/4 it's pretty fast, too. If you don't need the extra reach, the 300 by itself is a fantastic lens. I'm not saying the 300 with TC is not sharp, it is. It's just not quite the super sharp prime lens from heaven sharp that the 300 is by itself. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>There, I've made things clear as mud. One thing I think I can say is that I think most people would be quite satisfied with either of these lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 388387, member: 24569"] The Nikon lens and TC are a tad sharper, but the Tamron is no slouch. I can get very sharp results with it. I'm spending most of my time using the Tamron for its extra reach and the convenience of the zoom. It has VC, Tamron's version of VR, which is also a nice plus. I just wish the Tamron focused closer and weighed a little less. But, hey, it's got to be the lightest 600mm lens on the market, and it's very reasonably priced. The 1.4 TC does make the Nikon 300MM f/4 [I]slightly[/I] less sharp. By itself, the 300 is a SUPER sharp lens, and at f/4 it's pretty fast, too. If you don't need the extra reach, the 300 by itself is a fantastic lens. I'm not saying the 300 with TC is not sharp, it is. It's just not quite the super sharp prime lens from heaven sharp that the 300 is by itself. :) There, I've made things clear as mud. One thing I think I can say is that I think most people would be quite satisfied with either of these lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 150-600/Nikon 300 f/4 and 1.4x Comparison
Top