Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 100-400
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lokatz" data-source="post: 648150" data-attributes="member: 43924"><p>Can't wait for Part III of this series. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> I just bought the Nikon 200-500 in spite of its weight because its VR is far better than the Sigma 100-400's, which is otherwise a stellar lens. Abbot shows that Tamron's new 100-400 is just as incredibly sharp as the Sigma. Does its VR work any better? Will I want to sell the 200-500 again and buy the Tamron? Weight-wise, this is a no-brainer, so stay tuned...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lokatz, post: 648150, member: 43924"] Can't wait for Part III of this series. ;) I just bought the Nikon 200-500 in spite of its weight because its VR is far better than the Sigma 100-400's, which is otherwise a stellar lens. Abbot shows that Tamron's new 100-400 is just as incredibly sharp as the Sigma. Does its VR work any better? Will I want to sell the 200-500 again and buy the Tamron? Weight-wise, this is a no-brainer, so stay tuned... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tamron 100-400
Top
