Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kodiak" data-source="post: 172180" data-attributes="member: 15426">…semi reasonable wildlife shots???Hi John,I think, honestly, that this pict of a wanderer (I never laid eyes on before) is quite good.The take is sharp and I fancy the annular hi-lights of the bokeh!I would, with no intent to boldness, recommend an other rendition: since the quality of details pretained to the bird is very good and more important than the surrounding grass,I suggest to lower the key of the grass thus maintaining the tonal values of the bird.I believe that these tweaks will wipe out the &quot;semi reasonable&quot; attribute you gave your photograph!Have a good day…PS, one question: Image editing: NO ! Does this mean that you have no means to or that you do not wish that someone suggests edits ?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kodiak, post: 172180, member: 15426"] [COLOR="#B22222"]…semi reasonable wildlife shots???[/COLOR] Hi John, I think, honestly, that this pict of a wanderer (I never laid eyes on before) is quite good. The take is sharp and I fancy the annular hi-lights of the bokeh! I would, with no intent to boldness, recommend an other rendition: since the quality of details pretained to the bird is very good and more important than the surrounding grass, I suggest to lower the key of the grass thus maintaining the tonal values of the bird. I believe that these tweaks will wipe out the "semi reasonable" attribute you gave your photograph! Have a good day… PS, one question: Image editing: NO ! Does this mean that you have no means to or that you do not wish that someone suggests edits ? [/QUOTE]

Verification