Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Switched from Canon to Nikon, choose my new setup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 452706" data-attributes="member: 12855"><p>Realizing that even 600 family has better DR and IQ than old mk3? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>On-topic, I'd just get a used 70-200VRII (or even VRI, it's honestly NOT as bad as many make it out to be in real-life conditions), used 14-24, Tamron SP90 for macro, and choice of most used prime in 35-85 range. I feel 24-70 range is pointless next to 14-24 and 70-200, when say a 35 or 50 prime will basically cover what's missing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 452706, member: 12855"] Realizing that even 600 family has better DR and IQ than old mk3? :rolleyes: On-topic, I'd just get a used 70-200VRII (or even VRI, it's honestly NOT as bad as many make it out to be in real-life conditions), used 14-24, Tamron SP90 for macro, and choice of most used prime in 35-85 range. I feel 24-70 range is pointless next to 14-24 and 70-200, when say a 35 or 50 prime will basically cover what's missing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Switched from Canon to Nikon, choose my new setup!
Top
