Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Stoshowicz" data-source="post: 653645" data-attributes="member: 31397">Technically you are probably correct , you do great stuff, but in this case the purpose is just to present them as physical examples (rather than leave more space in front to imply probability of motion through the frame).  Most like these, I have roughly cropped to the rule of thirds ,with one of the lines of third , through the base of the bill, and a ,mostly, full profile, and inactive,  which is pretty standard. But like I began , you are probably correct that it would help the dynamics to do a more 'dynamic' crop than these have.</blockquote>