Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dangerspouse" data-source="post: 705668" data-attributes="member: 46690">Lol. Seems we have a consensus: TOO CLUTTERED! Got it. Point taken <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Hey Chris, thanks very much for adding suggestions for how I could make this shot better. It all sounds like excellent advice, particularly the overall admonition to keep their entire category in mind. You're right: the client is indeed the ultimate arbiter, and I gotta go with what they request over other - perhaps technically &quot;better&quot; - advice from anyone else, fellow photographers included. That's the way it is in my RL job, so I'm quite used to holding my tongue and following orders like a good soldier. Anyway, even if it's just for my own edification I'm going to put some of your suggestions to the test (once I buy more ingredients, *buuuurp*) and see how they turn out. Thanks again!:encouragement:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dangerspouse, post: 705668, member: 46690"] Lol. Seems we have a consensus: TOO CLUTTERED! Got it. Point taken :) Hey Chris, thanks very much for adding suggestions for how I could make this shot better. It all sounds like excellent advice, particularly the overall admonition to keep their entire category in mind. You're right: the client is indeed the ultimate arbiter, and I gotta go with what they request over other - perhaps technically "better" - advice from anyone else, fellow photographers included. That's the way it is in my RL job, so I'm quite used to holding my tongue and following orders like a good soldier. Anyway, even if it's just for my own edification I'm going to put some of your suggestions to the test (once I buy more ingredients, *[I]buuuurp[/I]*) and see how they turn out. Thanks again! :encouragement: [/QUOTE]

Verification