Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Standard zoom question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaomul" data-source="post: 210396" data-attributes="member: 17371"><p>I will look into the 18-105mm as well. I assumed that because of the 6x mag and the fact that it is reasonably priced that the quality may not be to great, but I'd be glad to be wrong on that as it would make a great all rounder due the focal length.</p><p></p><p>My reasoning behind the 35 and 50 isn't so much not zooming with my feet but I really like the 50 for portraits and headshots in and outdoors, yet it is to tight for general use especially indoors. The 35 I find better for indoor and group shots but isn't to flattering for individual close up portraits so I would kind of consider them as different purpose lenses. The 85mm is also a nice idea but is down my list. I would likely get a macro in the 90-100mm range and use this for the occasional portrait that i take in that range and kill 2 birds with one stone so to speak.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the info</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaomul, post: 210396, member: 17371"] I will look into the 18-105mm as well. I assumed that because of the 6x mag and the fact that it is reasonably priced that the quality may not be to great, but I'd be glad to be wrong on that as it would make a great all rounder due the focal length. My reasoning behind the 35 and 50 isn't so much not zooming with my feet but I really like the 50 for portraits and headshots in and outdoors, yet it is to tight for general use especially indoors. The 35 I find better for indoor and group shots but isn't to flattering for individual close up portraits so I would kind of consider them as different purpose lenses. The 85mm is also a nice idea but is down my list. I would likely get a macro in the 90-100mm range and use this for the occasional portrait that i take in that range and kill 2 birds with one stone so to speak. Thanks for the info [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Standard zoom question
Top
