Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Stacking Teleconverters - why not
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 657619" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p><strong>Re: Staking Teleconverters - why not</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Loss of light is one big downside, if you need to shoot wide open. </p><p></p><p>The sample shot above reported an F8 - but that was on a F 2.8 lens, on the F 5.6 lens it would be F16</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Had not thought that the lens trying to communicate to the camera could cause a glitch? </p><p></p><p>I really don't see myself doing this with my D500 - I do use both of them with the 200-500 but not both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 657619, member: 24285"] [b]Re: Staking Teleconverters - why not[/b] Loss of light is one big downside, if you need to shoot wide open. The sample shot above reported an F8 - but that was on a F 2.8 lens, on the F 5.6 lens it would be F16 Had not thought that the lens trying to communicate to the camera could cause a glitch? I really don't see myself doing this with my D500 - I do use both of them with the 200-500 but not both. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Stacking Teleconverters - why not
Top