Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 503001" data-attributes="member: 13556">It's still raining here, having done so solidly Sunday through this morning,&nbsp; and then off-and-on up to now.&nbsp; It kept me from working on focus fine-tuning yesterday, but it also allowed me to take a long nap during the day off from work.&nbsp; I'm not sure which I wanted to do more, work on focus or take a nap, but it was likely better for me to take the nap.&nbsp; :sleeping:I've read that the Sigma 20mm Art gives the Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 a run for its money, and also that the Nikkor beat the Zeiss in image quality, so I'll just take for granted that the Sigma is good.&nbsp; Even though the Zeiss is manual focus only, my immediate wants for this lens make manual focus better in some ways.&nbsp; (Using hyperfocal settings for maximum depth of field.)&nbsp; I'm really looking forward to more comparisons between the Sigma, Nikkor, and Zeiss.WM</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 503001, member: 13556"] It's still raining here, having done so solidly Sunday through this morning, and then off-and-on up to now. It kept me from working on focus fine-tuning yesterday, but it also allowed me to take a long nap during the day off from work. I'm not sure which I wanted to do more, work on focus or take a nap, but it was likely better for me to take the nap. :sleeping: I've read that the Sigma 20mm Art gives the Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 a run for its money, and also that the Nikkor beat the Zeiss in image quality, so I'll just take for granted that the Sigma is good. Even though the Zeiss is manual focus only, my immediate wants for this lens make manual focus better in some ways. (Using hyperfocal settings for maximum depth of field.) I'm really looking forward to more comparisons between the Sigma, Nikkor, and Zeiss. WM [/QUOTE]

Verification