Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Sooo, which 70-200 2.8?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 341450" data-attributes="member: 12855"><p>Problem w/ Sigma 500 and Tammy 600 - strictly sunny side up. I wouldn't even think of taking either indoors, but having a little-barrel-distortion, continuous aperture is just too tempting. Not to mention properly weather sealed lens unlike other extenders.</p><p></p><p>I do end up doing more wildlife on average, so I'll likey get the new tammy and then maybe a 50 1.8. A 1.4 is even more tempting, but mixed bag of reviews. Plus for a fast lens, maybe the D will do just fine and save some weight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 341450, member: 12855"] Problem w/ Sigma 500 and Tammy 600 - strictly sunny side up. I wouldn't even think of taking either indoors, but having a little-barrel-distortion, continuous aperture is just too tempting. Not to mention properly weather sealed lens unlike other extenders. I do end up doing more wildlife on average, so I'll likey get the new tammy and then maybe a 50 1.8. A 1.4 is even more tempting, but mixed bag of reviews. Plus for a fast lens, maybe the D will do just fine and save some weight. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Sooo, which 70-200 2.8?
Top
