Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Sony a9 Specs Revealed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 390546" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I'm not saying they're using <em>tricks</em>. I'm simply curious how they gain the pixel count and what effect it would have. When I first got my D3300 I was mighty impressed by all those numbers but the more you start reading and comparing, the more you realize that mighty numbers don't necessarily make mighty differences.</p><p></p><p>Take the D750 vs D810 as an example. This isn't about the one being better than the other. I was (and maybe still am) considering the D810 as a slow cam, low ISO - slow shutter shots like landscape or night. It seemed like the perfect cam for that, 36Mp, 50 native ISO etc. But when checking that what makes the difference like colors and dynamic range, the difference between both is almost trivial. That makes me wonder what the use of pixel count is when it makes such little difference there where it really matters?</p><p></p><p>In some way it feels like an increase in quantity while not bothering much about quality.</p><p></p><p>Therefor I'm curious if this new sensor will increase both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 390546, member: 31330"] I'm not saying they're using [I]tricks[/I]. I'm simply curious how they gain the pixel count and what effect it would have. When I first got my D3300 I was mighty impressed by all those numbers but the more you start reading and comparing, the more you realize that mighty numbers don't necessarily make mighty differences. Take the D750 vs D810 as an example. This isn't about the one being better than the other. I was (and maybe still am) considering the D810 as a slow cam, low ISO - slow shutter shots like landscape or night. It seemed like the perfect cam for that, 36Mp, 50 native ISO etc. But when checking that what makes the difference like colors and dynamic range, the difference between both is almost trivial. That makes me wonder what the use of pixel count is when it makes such little difference there where it really matters? In some way it feels like an increase in quantity while not bothering much about quality. Therefor I'm curious if this new sensor will increase both. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Sony a9 Specs Revealed!
Top