Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 340729" data-attributes="member: 15675">Now my reasoning is still that you will probably get most successful shots with the D4s, the Df will do somewhat better in evening scenes in places where people go around, the A7s might have an advantage in a range where light is so low that you would have to focus manually anyway.The other alternative for the A7s use is if you want to use it like a Leica.I'm still fan of the A7s, when it will be traded second hand at half the current price that is though. If I can get a Df at that time around that price, I might go Df, more practical. The D4s I consider out of my league. I will use my D7000 normally which performs better at ISO 100-200, and only go for the A7s when I need high ISO (for me that is a twilight forest stake-out). The weight matters since I probably want 3 bodies (1 fixed on a target, 1 for movement, 1 macro) and want to remain extremely mobile.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 340729, member: 15675"] Now my reasoning is still that you will probably get most successful shots with the D4s, the Df will do somewhat better in evening scenes in places where people go around, the A7s might have an advantage in a range where light is so low that you would have to focus manually anyway. The other alternative for the A7s use is if you want to use it like a Leica. I'm still fan of the A7s, when it will be traded second hand at half the current price that is though. If I can get a Df at that time around that price, I might go Df, more practical. The D4s I consider out of my league. I will use my D7000 normally which performs better at ISO 100-200, and only go for the A7s when I need high ISO (for me that is a twilight forest stake-out). The weight matters since I probably want 3 bodies (1 fixed on a target, 1 for movement, 1 macro) and want to remain extremely mobile. [/QUOTE]

Verification