Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="poisonborz" data-source="post: 502471" data-attributes="member: 40960">Thanks all.- Checking whether the camera identifies the lens&nbsp; correctly sounded like a good idea, but it seems to recognize them well:&nbsp; photo info said 35&nbsp;&nbsp; / 1.8 and 55-300 / 4.5 - 5.6 for my two lens,&nbsp; (fixed 35 and 55-300 Nikkor), and the focal length was also displayed&nbsp; correctly, all photos marked with manual focus.- I've tried all the constellations with back-button and shutter focus, I've also reset the settings a number of times. But since the setting is - unchangeably - set to single-point locked autofocus it wouldn't make much difference I think.What&nbsp; I don't understand is that if that's a motor failure, why is there no&nbsp; error message, and why is the AF button curiously disabled. At this point I get it&nbsp; back tomorrow - all things seem to point to a setting error, but seemingly every possible misconfiguration has been checked.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="poisonborz, post: 502471, member: 40960"] Thanks all. - Checking whether the camera identifies the lens correctly sounded like a good idea, but it seems to recognize them well: photo info said 35 / 1.8 and 55-300 / 4.5 - 5.6 for my two lens, (fixed 35 and 55-300 Nikkor), and the focal length was also displayed correctly, all photos marked with manual focus. - I've tried all the constellations with back-button and shutter focus, I've also reset the settings a number of times. But since the setting is - unchangeably - set to single-point locked autofocus it wouldn't make much difference I think. What I don't understand is that if that's a motor failure, why is there no error message, and why is the AF button curiously disabled. At this point I get it back tomorrow - all things seem to point to a setting error, but seemingly every possible misconfiguration has been checked. [/QUOTE]

Verification