Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
So tell me why I shouldn't jump to FX...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FastGlass" data-source="post: 456560" data-attributes="member: 13822"><p>The only con to me going to FX would be the reach of some zooms. I did a comparison not more than a week ago. I shoot my sons baseball teams games. I use my D3s. Why?</p><p>Allot of the games fall into the evening hours and the D3s is one of the kings of ISO performance. Plus it just feels more natural in my hands. The reach when comparing the same image at 200mm was not that big a diff for me to use my D90. Most people dont want to give up the reach and is why most people have both DX and FX.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FastGlass, post: 456560, member: 13822"] The only con to me going to FX would be the reach of some zooms. I did a comparison not more than a week ago. I shoot my sons baseball teams games. I use my D3s. Why? Allot of the games fall into the evening hours and the D3s is one of the kings of ISO performance. Plus it just feels more natural in my hands. The reach when comparing the same image at 200mm was not that big a diff for me to use my D90. Most people dont want to give up the reach and is why most people have both DX and FX. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
So tell me why I shouldn't jump to FX...
Top
