Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="10 Gauge" data-source="post: 478853" data-attributes="member: 39102">IMO more pixels is always &quot;better&quot; SO MUCH AS....&nbsp; The sensor &amp; image processor technology progresses WITH (or exceeds) the pixel count, meaning that even though they have crammed more pixels on the sensor, it's sensitivity to light stays the same or even improves, and no more or even less noise is present (all advancements of the sensor / image processor combination).&nbsp; There's no downside to more resolution, more detail, and the ability to make super fine crops as long as you aren't presented with the problems I have listed which are common when they start pixel-cramming sensors.&nbsp; You could say that file size would be a down side, but that would be something you would have to decide for yourself if it would be worth it or not.I know I wouldn't object to a 50+mp DX format body if it had the same high ISO capabilities of say the D750.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="10 Gauge, post: 478853, member: 39102"] IMO more pixels is always "better" SO MUCH AS.... The sensor & image processor technology progresses WITH (or exceeds) the pixel count, meaning that even though they have crammed more pixels on the sensor, it's sensitivity to light stays the same or even improves, and no more or even less noise is present (all advancements of the sensor / image processor combination). There's no downside to more resolution, more detail, and the ability to make super fine crops as long as you aren't presented with the problems I have listed which are common when they start pixel-cramming sensors. You could say that file size would be a down side, but that would be something you would have to decide for yourself if it would be worth it or not. I know I wouldn't object to a 50+mp DX format body if it had the same high ISO capabilities of say the D750. [/QUOTE]

Verification