Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Abstract
Smoke and light
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pretzel" data-source="post: 380825" data-attributes="member: 12257"><p>Curious,since you seem so hung up on using a flash... Since J-See is using LED lighting from below to get various colors into the smoke, how do you think a flash is going to effect that? Wouldn't that LESSEN the effect of the colored LEDs, thus destroying his sense of what the intended capture is? Wouldn't that "whitewash" blast of light deaden the nice oranges and reds and blues?</p><p></p><p>I think J-See understands why you're suggesting flash. Heck, I'm just a backwards redneck from Oklahoma, and after the multiple statements of "use flash, use flash, use flash", even I understand why you're suggesting flash. Well, at least I understand that you think it's the only way...</p><p></p><p>Some painters use acrylics, some use oil paints, some even used "childish" watercolors. All paintings are works of art though, and have the potential to be "MORE". In the same way, some photographers, use flash, some don't, some crank the ISO. When done well, especially in light of the technology available today, nobody can tell the difference unless it's intended. Heck, many of the cameras today can shoot higher ISO with little to ZERO noise already when the shot is properly exposed. An artist, in his minds eye, knows what he's after, and given time, he'll usually get it to come out in an amazing way.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes, ya just gotta let a dead horse run away so someone else can beat it later.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pretzel, post: 380825, member: 12257"] Curious,since you seem so hung up on using a flash... Since J-See is using LED lighting from below to get various colors into the smoke, how do you think a flash is going to effect that? Wouldn't that LESSEN the effect of the colored LEDs, thus destroying his sense of what the intended capture is? Wouldn't that "whitewash" blast of light deaden the nice oranges and reds and blues? I think J-See understands why you're suggesting flash. Heck, I'm just a backwards redneck from Oklahoma, and after the multiple statements of "use flash, use flash, use flash", even I understand why you're suggesting flash. Well, at least I understand that you think it's the only way... Some painters use acrylics, some use oil paints, some even used "childish" watercolors. All paintings are works of art though, and have the potential to be "MORE". In the same way, some photographers, use flash, some don't, some crank the ISO. When done well, especially in light of the technology available today, nobody can tell the difference unless it's intended. Heck, many of the cameras today can shoot higher ISO with little to ZERO noise already when the shot is properly exposed. An artist, in his minds eye, knows what he's after, and given time, he'll usually get it to come out in an amazing way. Sometimes, ya just gotta let a dead horse run away so someone else can beat it later. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Abstract
Smoke and light
Top