Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Single Image Tonemapping
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 184533" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>I thought I'd bring this up as some members are experimenting with it and I thought it would make a useful discussion. <strong>Tonemapping is not HDR</strong> (you cannot increase the dynamic range by manipulating a single image, that's another discussion), however it is an option in most HDR programs. I happen to like tonemapping but it has limitations and in many cases, leads to unnatural halos, gray skies and backgrounds. </p><p></p><p>Some shots are very receptive to it. The first shot is post processed normally and the second was tonemapped in Photomatix Light ($39). Generally, when you manipulate anything there is a cost, in this instance the clouds are a bit blown out. Feel free to comment/critique on any shots in this thread. Comparisons don't belong in critique, so I posted here. <strong>Please do not post HDR images here.</strong> <strong>Feel free to post your tonemapped shots, but be advised they will be open to critique in this thread. </strong>Be honest and polite, they go well together. An example to start us off,</p><p></p><p>Normal</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]47442[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Tonemapped</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]47443[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 184533, member: 4399"] I thought I'd bring this up as some members are experimenting with it and I thought it would make a useful discussion. [B]Tonemapping is not HDR[/B] (you cannot increase the dynamic range by manipulating a single image, that's another discussion), however it is an option in most HDR programs. I happen to like tonemapping but it has limitations and in many cases, leads to unnatural halos, gray skies and backgrounds. Some shots are very receptive to it. The first shot is post processed normally and the second was tonemapped in Photomatix Light ($39). Generally, when you manipulate anything there is a cost, in this instance the clouds are a bit blown out. Feel free to comment/critique on any shots in this thread. Comparisons don't belong in critique, so I posted here. [B]Please do not post HDR images here.[/B] [B]Feel free to post your tonemapped shots, but be advised they will be open to critique in this thread. [/B]Be honest and polite, they go well together. An example to start us off, Normal [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]47442._xfImport[/ATTACH] Tonemapped [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]47443._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Single Image Tonemapping
Top