Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 221690" data-attributes="member: 13196">My only contact with Sigma's customer service was with one of their circular polarizers. The problem was resolved to my satisfaction. I am a big Sigma fan. My first Sigma lens was for a Minolta XG-M camera. I purchased the lens used, and it was the sharpest little bugger for that camera! Since I was so happy with it, when I switched to Nikon, I bought a Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 and a Sigma 70-200mm f/3.5-4.5 macro. I still own both of these lenses and have added a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 and a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8. Since they now have that new line of art series lenses, they keep raising the bar.Glad to hear about your brother's contact with Sigma and how they are stepping up to help him. That's unbelievable in such a GOOD way--something we don't often hear about these days. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 221690, member: 13196"] My only contact with Sigma's customer service was with one of their circular polarizers. The problem was resolved to my satisfaction. I am a big Sigma fan. My first Sigma lens was for a Minolta XG-M camera. I purchased the lens used, and it was the sharpest little bugger for that camera! Since I was so happy with it, when I switched to Nikon, I bought a Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 and a Sigma 70-200mm f/3.5-4.5 macro. I still own both of these lenses and have added a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 and a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8. Since they now have that new line of art series lenses, they keep raising the bar. Glad to hear about your brother's contact with Sigma and how they are stepping up to help him. That's unbelievable in such a GOOD way--something we don't often hear about these days. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification