Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 198619" data-attributes="member: 13090">Rather than shoot at f/1.8, and deal with the frustration of out of focus shots that you *will* get due to the razor thin depth of field you'll have at those sorts of apertures, I think you might do better to crank up your ISO and deal with the inevitable noise you'll get in post processing. Blurriness due to a shallow DOF you can't correct for, not even a little. If the shot is blurry, you've blown the shot. Period. Digital noise on the other hand you *can* deal with, and pretty effectively at that given today's software. When faced with choosing between an out of focus shot and a noisy shot, I'll always crank up my ISO before going with a risky aperture/DOF. Aperture I control - ALWAYS - while ISO, really, is the least of my concerns. So long as my exposure is correct I'll let my ISO goes as high as it needs to get the shot. ......</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 198619, member: 13090"] Rather than shoot at f/1.8, and deal with the frustration of out of focus shots that you *will* get due to the razor thin depth of field you'll have at those sorts of apertures, I think you might do better to crank up your ISO and deal with the inevitable noise you'll get in post processing. Blurriness due to a shallow DOF you can't correct for, not even a little. If the shot is blurry, you've blown the shot. Period. Digital noise on the other hand you *can* deal with, and pretty effectively at that given today's software. When faced with choosing between an out of focus shot and a noisy shot, I'll always crank up my ISO before going with a risky aperture/DOF. Aperture I control - ALWAYS - while ISO, really, is the least of my concerns. So long as my exposure is correct I'll let my ISO goes as high as it needs to get the shot. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]......[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification