Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Sigma customer support
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 120204" data-attributes="member: 9237"><p>Well, it appears that with a +4 adjustment in AF fine tune, the lens is working pretty much at 100%. Much better than the 65+- that it was before. My only concern is once I go FF, the lens won't be calibrated to whatever camera that will be. But alas, first world problems, right?</p><p></p><p>The lens appears to be even 'creamier' than when I sent it in, too. Could be my imagination, too.. It's superbly sharp at f4 to f5.6 or so. Still soft at 1.4, and has some pretty extreme CA's at that aperture as well. In real pictures however, it matters little. I'm just glad that it seems to be working within tolerances now!</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8513018611/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8105/8513018611_148881a732_z.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8513018611/" target="_blank">Lens test 2</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/" target="_blank">stupidphotoguy</a>, on Flickr</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8234/8514128996_6af284482c_z.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/" target="_blank">Lens test 1</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/" target="_blank">stupidphotoguy</a>, on Flickr</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 120204, member: 9237"] Well, it appears that with a +4 adjustment in AF fine tune, the lens is working pretty much at 100%. Much better than the 65+- that it was before. My only concern is once I go FF, the lens won't be calibrated to whatever camera that will be. But alas, first world problems, right? The lens appears to be even 'creamier' than when I sent it in, too. Could be my imagination, too.. It's superbly sharp at f4 to f5.6 or so. Still soft at 1.4, and has some pretty extreme CA's at that aperture as well. In real pictures however, it matters little. I'm just glad that it seems to be working within tolerances now! [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8513018611/"][IMG]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8105/8513018611_148881a732_z.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8513018611/"]Lens test 2[/URL] by [URL="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/"]stupidphotoguy[/URL], on Flickr [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/"][IMG]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8234/8514128996_6af284482c_z.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/"]Lens test 1[/URL] by [URL="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/"]stupidphotoguy[/URL], on Flickr [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Sigma customer support
Top
