Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 70-300?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="torgo" data-source="post: 2108" data-attributes="member: 909"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><ObDisclaimer>I don't have this lens, nor have I used it.</ObDisclaimer></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">After doing some searches for this lens, it looks like the "macro" functionality is more just close-focusing, not true macro. According to Sigma, you can achieve 1:2 magnification (half life size) by enabling the macro mode at the longer focal lengths, decreasing the minimum focusing distance but not getting you to the true macro range of 1:1 magnification.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">If you're looking to do true macro photography, you may be left wanting; it's likely to be a little softer than a dedicated macro lens, and the magnification won't be there without using extension tubes or a close-focus diopter. If what you want is being able to get close-up photos, then you might be OK. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">It's an older lens, but for less than $200 at least you're not getting ripped off. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Reviews are the usual mixed bag; some people say it works great, others comments talk about the problems they've had, so it's hard to get a good feel for the overall quality of the lens from that. As long as wherever you get it from has a decent return policy, you could get it and see how it works for you.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="torgo, post: 2108, member: 909"] [FONT="Georgia"]<ObDisclaimer>I don't have this lens, nor have I used it.</ObDisclaimer> After doing some searches for this lens, it looks like the "macro" functionality is more just close-focusing, not true macro. According to Sigma, you can achieve 1:2 magnification (half life size) by enabling the macro mode at the longer focal lengths, decreasing the minimum focusing distance but not getting you to the true macro range of 1:1 magnification. If you're looking to do true macro photography, you may be left wanting; it's likely to be a little softer than a dedicated macro lens, and the magnification won't be there without using extension tubes or a close-focus diopter. If what you want is being able to get close-up photos, then you might be OK. It's an older lens, but for less than $200 at least you're not getting ripped off. :) Reviews are the usual mixed bag; some people say it works great, others comments talk about the problems they've had, so it's hard to get a good feel for the overall quality of the lens from that. As long as wherever you get it from has a decent return policy, you could get it and see how it works for you.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 70-300?
Top