Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 28-70mm 1:2.8-4 D - Any thoughts on this lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mestre" data-source="post: 62498" data-attributes="member: 6032"><p>I own the Sigma 24-70 2.8 HSM, the actual version of the lens you posted initially and I'm very satisfied.</p><p>I had the opportunity to test the lens you are talking about from a guy in a workshop so for me the main difference is the F/2.8-4 is slower to focus and makes too much noise but has a macro ratio that is quiet interesting. </p><p></p><p>I looked a lot before buying my Sigma and compared with the 28-70 Tamron. Optically the Sigma has some issues in FX but since I'm using it on a D7000 the lens is quiet sharp. And I do miss the 24mm on the wide side, since I replaced a DX 16-85 Nikkon. </p><p>Besides, as I own a Sigma 10-20 with a Lee 82mm filter system, I wanted to keep my set as simple as possible.</p><p></p><p>I guess both lenses are good options when compared to the high cost / pro 24-70 2.8 Nikon, optically they are very good in DX. There is also a new Tamron 24-70 2.8 with VC (the first lens of this type to have this feature) but it's more expensive but all the current reviews have been great.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mestre, post: 62498, member: 6032"] I own the Sigma 24-70 2.8 HSM, the actual version of the lens you posted initially and I'm very satisfied. I had the opportunity to test the lens you are talking about from a guy in a workshop so for me the main difference is the F/2.8-4 is slower to focus and makes too much noise but has a macro ratio that is quiet interesting. I looked a lot before buying my Sigma and compared with the 28-70 Tamron. Optically the Sigma has some issues in FX but since I'm using it on a D7000 the lens is quiet sharp. And I do miss the 24mm on the wide side, since I replaced a DX 16-85 Nikkon. Besides, as I own a Sigma 10-20 with a Lee 82mm filter system, I wanted to keep my set as simple as possible. I guess both lenses are good options when compared to the high cost / pro 24-70 2.8 Nikon, optically they are very good in DX. There is also a new Tamron 24-70 2.8 with VC (the first lens of this type to have this feature) but it's more expensive but all the current reviews have been great. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 28-70mm 1:2.8-4 D - Any thoughts on this lens?
Top