Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ejronin" data-source="post: 626677" data-attributes="member: 43743">The only thing I don't like about the ART series of lenses is concept of the dock to calibrate the lens to the body.I have a couple friends who have the 50 ART and they hate the calibration process, stating it's neither the most intuitive process and the results can vary enough that it's a consideration on purchasing another ART series.This doesn't pose much issue with me since I don't have several cameras and I've been curious about trying one out myself, however I have a converted Distagon 50 and a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D that I like quite a bit. From what I've seen and heard from single body users, they love the ART line. I've even read some comparisons to Zeiss glass when it comes to CA and center sharpness. Personally, they do look better than the Zeiss Milvus/Otus...or 8000 dollar digital eggplant)Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ejronin, post: 626677, member: 43743"] The only thing I don't like about the ART series of lenses is concept of the dock to calibrate the lens to the body. I have a couple friends who have the 50 ART and they hate the calibration process, stating it's neither the most intuitive process and the results can vary enough that it's a consideration on purchasing another ART series. This doesn't pose much issue with me since I don't have several cameras and I've been curious about trying one out myself, however I have a converted Distagon 50 and a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D that I like quite a bit. From what I've seen and heard from single body users, they love the ART line. I've even read some comparisons to Zeiss glass when it comes to CA and center sharpness. Personally, they do look better than the Zeiss Milvus/Otus...or 8000 dollar digital eggplant) Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification