Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 17-50 vs Nikkor 18-105 VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alfaholic" data-source="post: 334930" data-attributes="member: 13066"><p>Hello everyone...</p><p></p><p>I have 18-105, and now after more than two years of owning this lens I can say that I learned how to use it, actually I stopped listening to the purists about "kit lenses are not good" and started to use the lens the way it should be used.</p><p></p><p>I would like to upgrade, if I can use that term, so I am thinking about Sigma 17-50, which is 370 Euro here where I am from, and I am ready to spend that kind of money if this lens will give me the same IQ as my 18-105, just with f2.8 aperture.</p><p>I am saying at least the same as 18-105 because my friend told me that Tamron 17-50 and Sigma 17-50 are just too cheap, and that f2.8 is just a marketing trick, they are soft, and very bad, but I would be happy if this lens has better IQ than average 18-105 kit lens.</p><p>I saw so many reviews about this lens, and so many people like it, but I really do not know what to think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alfaholic, post: 334930, member: 13066"] Hello everyone... I have 18-105, and now after more than two years of owning this lens I can say that I learned how to use it, actually I stopped listening to the purists about "kit lenses are not good" and started to use the lens the way it should be used. I would like to upgrade, if I can use that term, so I am thinking about Sigma 17-50, which is 370 Euro here where I am from, and I am ready to spend that kind of money if this lens will give me the same IQ as my 18-105, just with f2.8 aperture. I am saying at least the same as 18-105 because my friend told me that Tamron 17-50 and Sigma 17-50 are just too cheap, and that f2.8 is just a marketing trick, they are soft, and very bad, but I would be happy if this lens has better IQ than average 18-105 kit lens. I saw so many reviews about this lens, and so many people like it, but I really do not know what to think. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Sigma 17-50 vs Nikkor 18-105 VR
Top