Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Sigma 15mm f2.8 Fisheye - First Impressions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 233830" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>My point was not about time. if you edit slowly thats fine. I was noting those that take 20+ per photo who edit the crap out of the photo where it looks nothing like the original or even close to. I believe in enhancing but not changing where its not recognizable from the original. copying pieces from other images . my point is if you cant get close to the picture you wanted through the gear, the software doesnt make you a great photographer. that person is no skill. its no skill to click buttons of plugins. when I shoot, I chimp the pics and say, yea, kick ass! I dont say, eh, Ill fix it in PS. I say, man this looks great, and once I tweak the color a little (fix the dance floor lights color cast a bit towards warmish colors) its going to look perfect. not, crap! but ill salvage it in PS. im saying, tweak and correct but sheesh people dont have limits. you should be at 90% of the image you want through skill and gear, not software. I respect a photog who's work is clean and doesnt need add on bling to make it stand out. clean and simple photographic style is classic and timeless and will always be relevant. photoshop bling is according to trend and is temporary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 233830, member: 14443"] My point was not about time. if you edit slowly thats fine. I was noting those that take 20+ per photo who edit the crap out of the photo where it looks nothing like the original or even close to. I believe in enhancing but not changing where its not recognizable from the original. copying pieces from other images . my point is if you cant get close to the picture you wanted through the gear, the software doesnt make you a great photographer. that person is no skill. its no skill to click buttons of plugins. when I shoot, I chimp the pics and say, yea, kick ass! I dont say, eh, Ill fix it in PS. I say, man this looks great, and once I tweak the color a little (fix the dance floor lights color cast a bit towards warmish colors) its going to look perfect. not, crap! but ill salvage it in PS. im saying, tweak and correct but sheesh people dont have limits. you should be at 90% of the image you want through skill and gear, not software. I respect a photog who's work is clean and doesnt need add on bling to make it stand out. clean and simple photographic style is classic and timeless and will always be relevant. photoshop bling is according to trend and is temporary. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Sigma 15mm f2.8 Fisheye - First Impressions
Top