Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BeerBelly" data-source="post: 632676" data-attributes="member: 35439"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>we're talking about the newest, Sports, version in combination with the D750. Before purchasing the Sigma, I owned the first generation Tamron 150-600mm. I sold it, to help fund the Sigma...</p><p>I found that I used the Tamron mainly at the long end and that long end required quite some light...The same is true for the Sigma, but I get to use it at 300/2.8 and 420/4 as well. When it comes to comparing image quality...here's what I've found:</p><p></p><p>As the bare lens, the Sigma is sharp wide open across all focal lengths...no need to stop down due to sharpness issues. This is a 100% crop at 300/2.8:</p><p>[ATTACH]263922[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Using the 1.4X TC and the longest focal length gives you 420mm/f4. This setting is perfectly usable but I recommend stopping down to f4.5 (it gets better).</p><p></p><p>At 600mm, it starts to show a bit of weakness wide open...here's a chart test I made (WB is off, but it shows how sharpness goes). These are 100% crops:</p><p><img src="http://www.bobr.si/files/600_comparison.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>As you can see it needs f7.1 or f8 to sharpen up nicely...but that was the case with my Tamron as well. Here are two real world shots at 5.6 and f8 so you can gauge the difference:</p><p></p><p>At f5.6: <a href="http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509569.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509569.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>At f8: <a href="http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509559.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509559.jpg</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BeerBelly, post: 632676, member: 35439"] Hi, we're talking about the newest, Sports, version in combination with the D750. Before purchasing the Sigma, I owned the first generation Tamron 150-600mm. I sold it, to help fund the Sigma... I found that I used the Tamron mainly at the long end and that long end required quite some light...The same is true for the Sigma, but I get to use it at 300/2.8 and 420/4 as well. When it comes to comparing image quality...here's what I've found: As the bare lens, the Sigma is sharp wide open across all focal lengths...no need to stop down due to sharpness issues. This is a 100% crop at 300/2.8: [ATTACH=CONFIG]263922._xfImport[/ATTACH] Using the 1.4X TC and the longest focal length gives you 420mm/f4. This setting is perfectly usable but I recommend stopping down to f4.5 (it gets better). At 600mm, it starts to show a bit of weakness wide open...here's a chart test I made (WB is off, but it shows how sharpness goes). These are 100% crops: [IMG]http://www.bobr.si/files/600_comparison.png[/IMG] As you can see it needs f7.1 or f8 to sharpen up nicely...but that was the case with my Tamron as well. Here are two real world shots at 5.6 and f8 so you can gauge the difference: At f5.6: [url]http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509569.jpg[/url] At f8: [url]http://www.bobr.si/files/_7509559.jpg[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8
Top
