Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
SIGMA 105 2.8 VS Nikon 105 2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ironwood" data-source="post: 295357" data-attributes="member: 10447"><p>I went through this same process last year. </p><p>First I decided on the Tokina, then after a bit more research I changed my mind and was about to order the Sigma 105, but at the last minute I found a near mint Nikon 105VR for $400. I jumped on the Nikon knowing that I could sell it again easily at a profit and get the Sigma if I wanted to.</p><p></p><p>I am liking the Nikon very much so I have kept it.</p><p></p><p>I use mine for close-up macro photos almost exclusively, handheld with flash, 1/320sec. </p><p>When I first got the lens I was using it with the VR turned on, but now I find I prefer to use it with the VR turned off. I always use it with AF turned off, I turn the focus ring to the closest focus and then back off a little, just to give me an inch more working distance and away I go.</p><p></p><p>So after that long story, the short of it is, for the work I do with mine I could do without VR and AF. Just saying.</p><p>But I do love the contrast and sharpness and colours I get with my Nikon, but I am sure if I did go with one of the others, I would like it too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ironwood, post: 295357, member: 10447"] I went through this same process last year. First I decided on the Tokina, then after a bit more research I changed my mind and was about to order the Sigma 105, but at the last minute I found a near mint Nikon 105VR for $400. I jumped on the Nikon knowing that I could sell it again easily at a profit and get the Sigma if I wanted to. I am liking the Nikon very much so I have kept it. I use mine for close-up macro photos almost exclusively, handheld with flash, 1/320sec. When I first got the lens I was using it with the VR turned on, but now I find I prefer to use it with the VR turned off. I always use it with AF turned off, I turn the focus ring to the closest focus and then back off a little, just to give me an inch more working distance and away I go. So after that long story, the short of it is, for the work I do with mine I could do without VR and AF. Just saying. But I do love the contrast and sharpness and colours I get with my Nikon, but I am sure if I did go with one of the others, I would like it too. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
SIGMA 105 2.8 VS Nikon 105 2.8
Top