Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
SIGMA 105 2.8 VS Nikon 105 2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 295001" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>At such a price, this Sigma is highly over-estimated, IMHO. I bought my Tamron 90mm f/2.8 for <400$ (rather close to 350$, if my memory serves me well). Keep that Nikon - the difference in price is reflected it difference in quality. Also, of all third party producers, Sigma's lenses are best known to be suffering from incompatibility with some "brand" camera models (such and such lens doesn't work with such and such Nikon's or Canon's model, while perfectly working with other models)...</p><p></p><p>edit: what "FredKingston" just posted: according to many reviewers, Tokina's model might be the best in it's class, out there, in terms of quality vs price. At the time I was about to get me a macro lens, it was not available in Serbia, so I purchased Tamron.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 295001, member: 18251"] At such a price, this Sigma is highly over-estimated, IMHO. I bought my Tamron 90mm f/2.8 for <400$ (rather close to 350$, if my memory serves me well). Keep that Nikon - the difference in price is reflected it difference in quality. Also, of all third party producers, Sigma's lenses are best known to be suffering from incompatibility with some "brand" camera models (such and such lens doesn't work with such and such Nikon's or Canon's model, while perfectly working with other models)... edit: what "FredKingston" just posted: according to many reviewers, Tokina's model might be the best in it's class, out there, in terms of quality vs price. At the time I was about to get me a macro lens, it was not available in Serbia, so I purchased Tamron. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
SIGMA 105 2.8 VS Nikon 105 2.8
Top
