I went through this same process last year.
First I decided on the Tokina, then after a bit more research I changed my mind and was about to order the Sigma 105, but at the last minute I found a near mint Nikon 105VR for $400. I jumped on the Nikon knowing that I could sell it again easily at a profit and get the Sigma if I wanted to.
I am liking the Nikon very much so I have kept it.
I use mine for close-up macro photos almost exclusively, handheld with flash, 1/320sec.
When I first got the lens I was using it with the VR turned on, but now I find I prefer to use it with the VR turned off. I always use it with AF turned off, I turn the focus ring to the closest focus and then back off a little, just to give me an inch more working distance and away I go.
So after that long story, the short of it is, for the work I do with mine I could do without VR and AF. Just saying.
But I do love the contrast and sharpness and colours I get with my Nikon, but I am sure if I did go with one of the others, I would like it too.
First I decided on the Tokina, then after a bit more research I changed my mind and was about to order the Sigma 105, but at the last minute I found a near mint Nikon 105VR for $400. I jumped on the Nikon knowing that I could sell it again easily at a profit and get the Sigma if I wanted to.
I am liking the Nikon very much so I have kept it.
I use mine for close-up macro photos almost exclusively, handheld with flash, 1/320sec.
When I first got the lens I was using it with the VR turned on, but now I find I prefer to use it with the VR turned off. I always use it with AF turned off, I turn the focus ring to the closest focus and then back off a little, just to give me an inch more working distance and away I go.
So after that long story, the short of it is, for the work I do with mine I could do without VR and AF. Just saying.
But I do love the contrast and sharpness and colours I get with my Nikon, but I am sure if I did go with one of the others, I would like it too.