Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Shutter speed vs focal length ratio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 347774" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I don't use my 70-200mm handheld because of its weight, but when I use my 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6, the 'Active' VR works better for me than 'Normal.' I have chronic forearm tendonitis so it is especially difficult to hold the camera steady. The 'Active' VR gives me much sharper photos than 'Normal' VR. 'Active' VR is supposed to be for gross movements, and while I'm not overly shaky, it does work better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 347774, member: 13196"] I don't use my 70-200mm handheld because of its weight, but when I use my 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6, the 'Active' VR works better for me than 'Normal.' I have chronic forearm tendonitis so it is especially difficult to hold the camera steady. The 'Active' VR gives me much sharper photos than 'Normal' VR. 'Active' VR is supposed to be for gross movements, and while I'm not overly shaky, it does work better. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Shutter speed vs focal length ratio
Top
