Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Should I step across from FX to DX?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 562394" data-attributes="member: 24569"><p>Geoff, there will be those who insist that FF is always a better choice than DX. I am not one of those. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Since I got my D500 I have seen the capabilities of this camera, and I see no reason to want more of anything. Fast, accurate focusing, 10 fps, a great sensor that provides very good sharpness, good ISO capabilities, and enough resolution for anything I do with my photos. </p><p></p><p>If I already had all the FX glass that you have, I might think twice. Then again, all that glass will work just fine on an FX body. </p><p></p><p>Just throwing out this idea: One option for you might be to sell the 16-35, the 50, and get the Nikon 10-24 to go with the lenses you already have. The 24-120 would seem to be a very handy lens, and I guess I'd keep that one around, but it depends on what your normal shooting entails.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 562394, member: 24569"] Geoff, there will be those who insist that FF is always a better choice than DX. I am not one of those. :) Since I got my D500 I have seen the capabilities of this camera, and I see no reason to want more of anything. Fast, accurate focusing, 10 fps, a great sensor that provides very good sharpness, good ISO capabilities, and enough resolution for anything I do with my photos. If I already had all the FX glass that you have, I might think twice. Then again, all that glass will work just fine on an FX body. Just throwing out this idea: One option for you might be to sell the 16-35, the 50, and get the Nikon 10-24 to go with the lenses you already have. The 24-120 would seem to be a very handy lens, and I guess I'd keep that one around, but it depends on what your normal shooting entails. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Should I step across from FX to DX?
Top