Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Should I shoot JPG or RAW?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zev" data-source="post: 753464" data-attributes="member: 49151"><p>I'm a wedding photographer with over 30 years experience, previously shooting with the Nikon 801, then Nikon F100. The few weddings I've shot with my D7200, I've only shot JPG, and the results have been incredible. Only a handful need any editing, which means my time on the computer is negligible. The images my clients get are basically straight out of the camera. 6000 x 4000 Hi Res. They have all been thrilled with the quality they get.</p><p></p><p></p><p>However, a few colleagues have told me this is not very professional, and I should only shoot RAW. But this would mean spending countless hours in front of the computer, and I very much doubt my clients would see any difference.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In my pastime, I shoot landscapes for myself. Also in JPG. And once again, very little editing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Does any pro shoot JPG? How would shooting RAW files make a difference to my business? Would shooting RAW give me better landscape images after editing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zev, post: 753464, member: 49151"] I'm a wedding photographer with over 30 years experience, previously shooting with the Nikon 801, then Nikon F100. The few weddings I've shot with my D7200, I've only shot JPG, and the results have been incredible. Only a handful need any editing, which means my time on the computer is negligible. The images my clients get are basically straight out of the camera. 6000 x 4000 Hi Res. They have all been thrilled with the quality they get. However, a few colleagues have told me this is not very professional, and I should only shoot RAW. But this would mean spending countless hours in front of the computer, and I very much doubt my clients would see any difference. In my pastime, I shoot landscapes for myself. Also in JPG. And once again, very little editing. Does any pro shoot JPG? How would shooting RAW files make a difference to my business? Would shooting RAW give me better landscape images after editing? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Should I shoot JPG or RAW?
Top