Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Should I replace Nikon 24 120 f/4 VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sudipto" data-source="post: 639576" data-attributes="member: 43364"><p>I got the lens as kit lens which I have been using for last two and half years. As you all are aware that this is a good lens but not excellent to create crispy sharp, high contrast and high colour rendition. </p><p></p><p>Should I move for sets of prime lenses like 35mm, 24mm, 50mm and 80mm slowly or a 24 70 f/2.8? First option is phased approach, but second one is lumpsum[emoji57].</p><p></p><p>My photography interest is basically historical architecture, landscape, travel and family. For nature I use 105 macro and 80 400 g VR lens. I am happy with these lenses. I am enthusiast but actively participate in competition.</p><p></p><p>Please suggest which is the optimum approach from three aspects- cash flow, convenience and picture quality.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sudipto, post: 639576, member: 43364"] I got the lens as kit lens which I have been using for last two and half years. As you all are aware that this is a good lens but not excellent to create crispy sharp, high contrast and high colour rendition. Should I move for sets of prime lenses like 35mm, 24mm, 50mm and 80mm slowly or a 24 70 f/2.8? First option is phased approach, but second one is lumpsum[emoji57]. My photography interest is basically historical architecture, landscape, travel and family. For nature I use 105 macro and 80 400 g VR lens. I am happy with these lenses. I am enthusiast but actively participate in competition. Please suggest which is the optimum approach from three aspects- cash flow, convenience and picture quality. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Should I replace Nikon 24 120 f/4 VR
Top