Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Should I Photoshop or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grumpy Old Bag" data-source="post: 224314" data-attributes="member: 17939"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>Thanks for all the comments. </p><p></p><p>Thank you Jack for the edit. It seems your edit is better than my shot. </p><p></p><p>I must say I am a little disappointed in you people, nobody told me it is a crappy shot and I have to go back and do it again. So I told myself and I did it again. </p><p>If this one is crappy I don’t know what more can I do. Same Rose – 24 hours later. </p><p></p><p>Same camera, different settings.</p><p>1/160sec</p><p>F6.3</p><p>Program Auto</p><p>ISO 200</p><p>Centre Weight Metering</p><p>Saturation: High</p><p>Sharpness: Hard</p><p>Focal Length: 62mm</p><p></p><p>This time I cheated: Sprayed water and cloned out the “bite” in the leaf.</p><p>For this shot I used a tripod to get it sharper, changed my point of view to get a better background. In the Menu I set Colour to More Vivid.</p><p></p><p>I do not have a calibrated screen. I “calibrated” one of my screens to my camera. Sometimes I look at images on three different screens, two at work and one at home. What worries me is that it seems to me whatever some of you see on your screen is different to what I see on my screen. Most of you recon my images are too dark. Looking at Jack’s edit it seems a lot of noise has been introduced to the image. The edit is not much lighter than the original post, though the dark areas from the original image are brighter. </p><p></p><p>Is this one still too dark? Hope it is better than the first one. </p><p></p><p>Thank you again for spending time to look and comment, it is always much appreciated. </p><p> </p><p>[ATTACH]60654[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grumpy Old Bag, post: 224314, member: 17939"] Hi, Thanks for all the comments. Thank you Jack for the edit. It seems your edit is better than my shot. I must say I am a little disappointed in you people, nobody told me it is a crappy shot and I have to go back and do it again. So I told myself and I did it again. If this one is crappy I don’t know what more can I do. Same Rose – 24 hours later. Same camera, different settings. 1/160sec F6.3 Program Auto ISO 200 Centre Weight Metering Saturation: High Sharpness: Hard Focal Length: 62mm This time I cheated: Sprayed water and cloned out the “bite” in the leaf. For this shot I used a tripod to get it sharper, changed my point of view to get a better background. In the Menu I set Colour to More Vivid. I do not have a calibrated screen. I “calibrated” one of my screens to my camera. Sometimes I look at images on three different screens, two at work and one at home. What worries me is that it seems to me whatever some of you see on your screen is different to what I see on my screen. Most of you recon my images are too dark. Looking at Jack’s edit it seems a lot of noise has been introduced to the image. The edit is not much lighter than the original post, though the dark areas from the original image are brighter. Is this one still too dark? Hope it is better than the first one. Thank you again for spending time to look and comment, it is always much appreciated. [ATTACH=CONFIG]60654._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Should I Photoshop or not?
Top
