Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott Murray" data-source="post: 104240" data-attributes="member: 9753">This doesn't sound right <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />[h=3]3. False Light[/h]Publicity which places a person in a false light. using a photo out of context can imply that a person in the photo was doing something they weren''t. usually not the photo itself but the caption, text or presentation of the photo. similar to libel. a misleading or offensive display of someone). This is defamation, an aspect of which is libel. Libel includes a non-truthful photo, or display of a photo, which ridicules, humiliates, or provokes contempt for, a living person or company. In the case of a public figure, libel is narrowed to malice and reckless disregard for the truth. First Amendment be provide a “constitutional override, permitting free speach for the public benefit.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott Murray, post: 104240, member: 9753"] This doesn't sound right ;) [h=3]3. False Light[/h][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Open Sans]Publicity which places a person in a false light. using a photo out of context can imply that a person in the photo was doing something they weren''t. usually not the photo itself but the caption, text or presentation of the photo. similar to libel. a misleading or offensive display of someone). This is defamation, an aspect of which is libel. Libel includes a non-truthful photo, or display of a photo, which ridicules, humiliates, or provokes contempt for, a living person or company. In the case of a public figure, libel is narrowed to malice and reckless disregard for the truth. First Amendment be provide a “constitutional override, permitting free speach for the public benefit.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification