Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Newstech" data-source="post: 485815" data-attributes="member: 40271">Uh-oh, we don't want a new religious war, do we? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />I hereby declare that you're all correct. It's OK to want that ZOWIE HDR look, and for that I'm guessing it's smart to bracket. Using a nice Canon point-and shoot I've done both scripted bracketing and manual, and manual is really not that hard, even handheld. (Yay, autoalignment!)But the high dynamic range of the D3200 sensor seems to open up possibilities beyond normal tonal adjustment. And who doesn't want that?Max RAW DR seems to test at 13.2-13.3, impressive compared with Nikons that are not that much older. The tests also show that tails off fast as ISO goes up. Best to stick with 100, maybe 200 max.I'd like to try both methods on the same scene but probably can't get to that until the weekend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Newstech, post: 485815, member: 40271"] Uh-oh, we don't want a new religious war, do we? :D I hereby declare that you're all correct. It's OK to want that ZOWIE HDR look, and for that I'm guessing it's smart to bracket. Using a nice Canon point-and shoot I've done both scripted bracketing and manual, and manual is really not that hard, even handheld. (Yay, autoalignment!) But the high dynamic range of the D3200 sensor seems to open up possibilities beyond normal tonal adjustment. And who doesn't want that? Max RAW DR seems to test at 13.2-13.3, impressive compared with Nikons that are not that much older. The tests also show that tails off fast as ISO goes up. Best to stick with 100, maybe 200 max. I'd like to try both methods on the same scene but probably can't get to that until the weekend. [/QUOTE]

Verification