Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 477348" data-attributes="member: 31330">That's one major advantage; you never blow the highlights. I find the highlights critical in many of my shots since a lot of detail is composed out of highlights and by not using ISO, I not only preserve those, I also avoid squeezing them together.You're right about not being able to check what you're doing. It's a disadvantage but then again, that's how we did it in the film days.I haven't tested it yet but I think ISOless will work nice for concerts where light constantly fluctuates and differs in intensity. By setting shutter and aperture to the optimal required for a shot, (and in that truly exposing to the right) you ensure that whatever the lighting will be, it'll close to never blow out. In post you can readjust the individual levels to your preferences.</blockquote>