Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5100
Sharpness increase - any negatives?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 102317" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>I think you might be referring to the In Camera setting for JPEGS,, like Vivid versus Normal.. People taste vary on their settings.</p><p></p><p>This is in Set Picture Control, and the mode has a large effect in how your JPEGs look.. </p><p></p><p>Me: I have mine set on Vivid (reminds me of Fuji Film), Saturation in the middle, and I move sharpening up, just one click, </p><p></p><p>oversharpening in camera is loosing information and such, so,, I tend to sharpen in Post..</p><p></p><p>now this leads to the debate of RAW versus JPEG.... Purist will state that they ONLY use RAW. </p><p></p><p>My rule, is that I start with the JPEG, for many uses, the JPEG is very fine (keeps getting better), and just </p><p>quicker to work off the JPEG and requires less adjustments, </p><p></p><p>If I think the picture is portfolio quality, then I will open the RAW and try to "beat" my JPEG edit. Sometimes</p><p>I end up happier with the JPEG editor, and othertimes the RAW.</p><p></p><p>Now if I screwed up the whitebalance or some other flaw in the JPEG, then better to fix starting with the </p><p>RAW files.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 102317, member: 10038"] I think you might be referring to the In Camera setting for JPEGS,, like Vivid versus Normal.. People taste vary on their settings. This is in Set Picture Control, and the mode has a large effect in how your JPEGs look.. Me: I have mine set on Vivid (reminds me of Fuji Film), Saturation in the middle, and I move sharpening up, just one click, oversharpening in camera is loosing information and such, so,, I tend to sharpen in Post.. now this leads to the debate of RAW versus JPEG.... Purist will state that they ONLY use RAW. My rule, is that I start with the JPEG, for many uses, the JPEG is very fine (keeps getting better), and just quicker to work off the JPEG and requires less adjustments, If I think the picture is portfolio quality, then I will open the RAW and try to "beat" my JPEG edit. Sometimes I end up happier with the JPEG editor, and othertimes the RAW. Now if I screwed up the whitebalance or some other flaw in the JPEG, then better to fix starting with the RAW files. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5100
Sharpness increase - any negatives?
Top