Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dawg Pics" data-source="post: 609346" data-attributes="member: 26505">@ Horoscope FishYou aren't being argumentative. You are right that the blogger's images are processed. I missed the &quot;no processing&quot; part. My bad. I didn't come up with &quot;digital plastic surgery&quot;. That came from the Modcloth article.&nbsp; Now, I am convinced I read into that blogger's answer wrong. I read her FAQ again.&nbsp; She seems to think Lightroom is ok but Photoshop isn't because it is used to edit people. She would be wrong.I think I get it now. Ugh!&nbsp; She is giving conflicting and inaccurate information. As usual, you make me see the error of my ways. &nbsp;&nbsp; [MENTION=41839]Borga Voffe[/MENTION]&nbsp;I retract the language barrier/vocabulary (her vocabulary) statement. It isn't you. It is the blogger's conflicting information that is confusing. My apologies. Why she would state she uses Lightroom and then turn around and say she uses &quot;no processing&quot; is beyond me. I somehow missed that part of her statement.&nbsp; No doubt, she processes the images in Lightroom.The blogger seems to think Lightroom is ok, but Photoshop is not because it is used for editing people. Here is what she gets way wrong: The blogger stated Modcloth signed a &quot;no Photoshop pledge&quot;, which they didn't. They have, &quot;The Heroes Pledge for Advertisers,&quot; in which they have a policy that they don't drastically edit out skin and body imperfections in their images. They also state clearly that they use Photoshop.I think she has some misunderstanding of Photoshop and for what it is used.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dawg Pics, post: 609346, member: 26505"] @ Horoscope Fish You aren't being argumentative. You are right that the blogger's images are processed. I missed the "no processing" part. My bad. I didn't come up with "digital plastic surgery". That came from the Modcloth article. Now, I am convinced I read into that blogger's answer wrong. I read her FAQ again. She seems to think Lightroom is ok but Photoshop isn't because it is used to edit people. She would be wrong. I think I get it now. Ugh! She is giving conflicting and inaccurate information. As usual, you make me see the error of my ways. [MENTION=41839]Borga Voffe[/MENTION] I retract the language barrier/vocabulary (her vocabulary) statement. It isn't you. It is the blogger's conflicting information that is confusing. My apologies. Why she would state she uses Lightroom and then turn around and say she uses "no processing" is beyond me. I somehow missed that part of her statement. No doubt, she processes the images in Lightroom. The blogger seems to think Lightroom is ok, but Photoshop is not because it is used for editing people. Here is what she gets way wrong: The blogger stated Modcloth signed a "no Photoshop pledge", which they didn't. They have, "The Heroes Pledge for Advertisers," in which they have a policy that they don't drastically edit out skin and body imperfections in their images. They also state clearly that they use Photoshop. I think she has some misunderstanding of Photoshop and for what it is used. [/QUOTE]

Verification